Sunday, November 8, 2020

Space and Language

Eric Vilmer


11/8/20


Professor Simpson


                Short Essay for Week 12


In my opinion these essays had similarities to that of the essays we read on native Alaskans and 


how they are treated. “Disarmed of their savagery, the natives become figures of irony. They stand in 


for irredeemable nature. Forty years later, Breton could refer quite casually to a notorious bushranger as 


‘this gloomy savage’ - as if the Aborigines had never existed, except as a figure of speech.” (Carter,


321) These essays do not seem to specifically tie to a specific space where natives resided, they seem to


be more about the white man's perspective on natives in general. Perhaps both essays were set in 


Australia, but I noticed in the second essay that Carter seems to mention Australia and New Zealand 


and how names are created. One specific example of name creation is when they are discussing the 


names of plants. “On the endeavor voyage, Solander and Banks made use of the system of 


classification developed and popularized by the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus. The Linnaean system 


was artificial in the sense that it was derived from no detailed examination of plant morphology, which 


might reveal ‘natural’ affinities between distinct species.” (Carter, 18-19) What I make of this and 


names in general is the fact that people look at names and think of objects or even ideas as the name


instead of whatever the physical thing or person is. We make names and definitions and that is where a


stereotype starts. Many people do not stop and look at the physical world as it is but they look at the


world through their opinions that were constructed mainly by other people of the past.

1 comment:

  1. Eric, We are reading Paul Carter for next week 11/12. So perhaps you will flip flop next week with the Reading from week 11, Bodies in Space. The focus on the act of naming is an important one for Carter. You are right that the "author" of a space has a significant impact upon it. What then is the role of language in "making" a space possible. How doe Carter relate perceived, conceived, and lived processes throughout the reading? And consider the alternative method of making space described in the reading as well.

    ReplyDelete